After an argument, Thomas was advised not to
write his blog in the third person because it implied that he wasn’t
responsible for it. He resented the suggestion and said that no one wrote the
blog but him and that he could prove it on account of the spelling. But Graeme
(not his real name, but it’s a name Thomas dislikes almost as much as he dislikes
Anthony C. Berber, so its use is appropriate) said he was referring to the
blog’s narrator being “Thomas” and not “I”.
Thomas thought about this and
realised that he wrote it this way because he dislikes talking about himself
almost as much as others dislike hearing about him. Moreover, it didn’t matter
because no one read the thing anyway. Graeme said that he did, otherwise he
wouldn’t be making the point, and Thomas said that if the only pointing out was
going to be criticism, then he’d prefer it wasn’t read in the first place.
Graeme then asked why Thomas was bothering to write a blog at all, to which
Thomas said that it was probably for the same reason Graeme was bothering to read
it. “To annoy people,” said Thomas. “Because I’m good at that.” Graeme said
that blogs can’t be written in the third person because the whole point of them
is to create an intimacy with the blog’s reader. Thomas said that he’d readily
create intimacy for Graeme by shoving the blog up his bottom, and act which
would, ironically, turn Graeme into an unconventional blog post in very much
the first person.
No comments:
Post a Comment